#REASON VS CUBASE VS LOGIC VS ABLETON 64 BIT#
#REASON VS CUBASE VS LOGIC VS ABLETON SOFTWARE#
#REASON VS CUBASE VS LOGIC VS ABLETON PC#
#REASON VS CUBASE VS LOGIC VS ABLETON WINDOWS#

Just goes to show you, software is just software, bells and whistles will always be added with each upgrade, but it's the person using it that makes the difference.Ībelton is very nice, I like to add some of the effects in live to some of my samples.

I know many people who use it as their main sequencer nowadays, as it's so brilliant.

#REASON VS CUBASE VS LOGIC VS ABLETON PC#

Most home musos and pros alike are making killer material with a pc and Cubase, even Atari is still being used by some (tight sequencing).įurthermore, don't discount Ableton Live as one of the main apps. I base this on all the artist and engineer interviews I read in Sound On Sound and Future Music for the past 4 years. If a program fits several categories, such as a comprehensive digital audio workstation or a foundation. In Europe, specifically the UK, Cubase and Logic are more widespread, with PT LE catching up at a rapid rate. Practica will be listed here, but not Palestrina. In many cases, it's a combination of both PT and something else. For the more midi-based musician and film composers, Logic and DP seem to be the ones. What’s the difference between Cubase, Logic Pro, Reason, and WaveLab Compare Cubase vs. Heres a good video about Abletons sample warping capabilities. I know that Cubase has some warping functionality when you edit the sample, but Ive never been able to get it as smooth and intuitive as Ableton. Sound for film, post-production and major studio multitracking, it's PT hands-down. In Ableton, its literally click on the marker, drag it where you want it, and thats it. This also depends on what area of audio we're talking about. but I think it's mostly justifying the cost of the software.I would say in the US, it's mostly PT or Logic.

#REASON VS CUBASE VS LOGIC VS ABLETON 64 BIT#

Personally I don't care for any of the hype, but Nuendo, SAW studio, Pro Tools HD, and Sonar 64 bit version all have their adherents stating it sounds better etc. I don't think it's a bad idea to use Logic or Cubase, but I do think that if it's simply because you think it sounds better, it might not be that great of an idea. My personal tests with Logic VS Live sound wise concluded that 0 db in Logic was simply louder than Live's version of 0 db, if I turned Live up a little it 'sounded' just as good with warp turned off.

#REASON VS CUBASE VS LOGIC VS ABLETON WINDOWS#

which apparently is written by one guy, hence the Windows only status of the application, and the possibility that it doesn't have the Nuendo sound engine. There probably is something similar in Sound Forge. While Cubase presents a flexible approach to mixing music, Ableton does best for Live performance it is a very flexible DAW to work with for live performance. In Logic there is a control for panning, it does change the way you hear the sound. No I am not an experienced mixer nor producer but I don't have shit in my ears ) A couple things. Wavelab and so I guess Cubase's audi engine simply sounded better.

Live gave the audio file much less definition which was a kind of a bummer for me cause I initially chose for the Live only strategy:(Īnyway I understood that Wavelab and Cubase have the same audio engine and now my dilemma is should I go for Cubase or Logic( which I already know well as a DAW)Īs I need to buy a new dual core PC/Mac anyways I consider which way would be wise.Īctually I am searching someone who uses/has experience with both, Cubase SX and Logic Pro 7 and can tell which one sounds best?ĭaduk wrote: I did nothing fancy in my very simple test, just the same audio file played back through Live 6 and Wavelab both at 0 db. The conclusion of my test was that the audio file in Wavelab sounded MUCH more punchy and fuller. Yesterday I tested an audio file in Wavelab and in Live 6, both on 0 db and with warping off in Live 6.

You makes 10 bass patters and put them into the grid. So you make 10 drum patterns and stack them up in the grid. I sold my G5 just before the whole intel transition which meant I could not use Logic anymore, Logic 5 for pc was and is to outdated in terms ouf sound quality. But what people are talking about here is that it is really intended to be used in a grid system of clips/patters and scenes. I currently I only use Live 6 as a DAW after using Logic Pro 5 and 6 for about two years. Cubase Artist 500 (USB-eLicenser inclusive) Cubase Pro 878 (USB-eLicenser inclusive) Note that developers are liable to change the price of their software at any time. Cubase will be better for those who focus on structure, have the sounds predefined, and prefer a traditional, heavily customizable workflow. Ok I realise that this subject is never discussed here so I thought let's share my dillema. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. The main differences between Ableton Live and Cubase are that Ableton has live performance oriented features that Cubase lacks, and might benefit sound explorations.

Reason vs cubase vs logic vs ableton